Legal Opinion
Stark v. Waters
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided November 19, 1958No. 20260, 20262PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Duckworth, Chief Justice.
We are fully acquainted with the consistent rulings of this court that neither a temporary restraining order nor a continuance which is temporary of such order is reviewable. We recognize and give full effect to Code (Ann.) § 6-701 (Ga. L. 1957, pp. 224, 230), Wofford Oil Co. v. City of Nashville, 177 Ga. 460 (170 S. E. 369), Hall v. Hall, 185 Ga. 502 (195 S. E. 731), and Grizzel v. Grizzel, 188 Ga. 418 (3 S. E. 2d 649), cited by defendants in error in support of this motion to dismiss. But such ex parte orders are not intended to serve the function of a permanent…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Stegall v. Southwest Ga. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Franklin v. HarperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Stegall v. Southwest Georgia Regional Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Hall v. HallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Grizzel v. GrizzelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Atlanta v. Henry Grady Hotel Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1964
- Revels v. HairSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Sheet Metal Workers International Ass'n v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974