People v. Giddens
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that the court did not comply with CPL 270.40 because it failed to instruct the jurors in its preliminary instructions that prior to discharge they were prohibited from arranging for any payment or benefit in return for information concerning the trial and that they had a duty to report any attempt to influence improperly any member of the jury. Defendant, however, did not object to the court’s preliminary instructions. The issue, therefore, has not been preserved for our review and we decline to review it in the interest of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. RiveraNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. HickeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- People v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. SchulzeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. FishAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. LumpkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. SpicolaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. MortonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.