Legal Opinion

Stoyanov v. Mabus

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided August 26, 2015No. Civil Action No. DKC 07-1985PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DEBORAH K. CHASANOW, District Judge.

Presently pending and ready for resolution in this employment discrimination case are several motions: a motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment filed by Defendants Ray Mabus, et al. (ECF No. 25); two motions to compel filed by Plaintiff Yuri J. Stoyanov (ECF Nos. 29 and 30); a motion to sequester a witness filed by Plaintiff (ECF No. 31); and a motion to disqualify counsel filed by Plaintiff (ECF No. 32). The relevant issues have been fully briefed, and the court now rules, no hearing being deemed necessary. Local…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Stoyanov v. BehrleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
  2. Barreto v. SGT, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2019
  3. Berrios v. MagnusDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2023
  4. Crawford v. Prince George's County Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2023
  5. Hamilton v. Prince George's CountyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2019

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API