Wuliger v. Anstaett
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KATZ, Senior District Judge.
I. Background
Plaintiff William T. Wuliger (“Wuliger”) commenced this action against Defendant for recovery of commissions in connection with the sale of viatical investments. This case is an outgrowth of the Liberte v. Capwill 1 litigation which has spawned related litigation both in the state and federal courts. The essence of this action contends that Defendant Jay Anstaett (“Anstaett”) entered into an agent sales agreement whereby he solicited individuals to invest in viatical settlements offered by Alpha Capital Group (“Alpha”). In return for…
2Cases cited69 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lopardo v. Lehman Bros., Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008
- In Re Keithley Instruments, Inc., Derivative LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008
- Wuliger v. ARDAN GROUP, LTD.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2007