Legal Opinion

State v. Skibinski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 2, 1982PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously modified and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: In 1976 and 1977 defendant was employed as an account clerk in the Buffalo office of the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance. During that time cash shortages were discovered and defendant was subsequently charged with the loss, the indictment containing 22 specific counts of wrongdoing. He was acquitted of all charges in 1979. The State was reimbursed for the lost funds by its insurer who was then subrogated to the State’s rights and prosecutes this civil action…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. People Ex Rel. Taylor v. . ForbesNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Niagara Falls Urban Renewal Agency v. FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  4. Mamunes v. SzczepanskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  5. Southbridge Finishing Co. v. GoldingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. Carey Resources, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Flushing National Bank v. Transamerica InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. People v. GrimesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. People v. WebbAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. People v. CallicutAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API