Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. RPM International, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 20, 2016No. Civil Action No. 16-1803 (ABJ)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) has brought this action for securities violations under the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”), the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), and Exchange Act Rules, against defendants RPM International, Inc. (“RPM”) and RPM’s General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer Edward W. Moore (“Moore”). Compl. [Dkt. # 1] ¶¶ 1, 3 8-9, 85-105. Plaintiff alleges that defendants fraudulently failed to disclose loss contingencies on certain SEC filings after the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Norwood v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Savoy Industries, Inc. Appeal of S. Mort ZimmermanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Trout Unlimited v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
- Greater Yellowstone Coalition v. BosworthDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Campbell v. CampbellDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
- Unitedhealthcare Insurance Company v. BurwellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Chadwell v. the Office of Representative Troy Nehls, US House of RepresentativesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- Correll v. U.S. Patent and Trademark OfficeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- DR. SHANNON “SJ” JOSLIN v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.