Legal Opinion

Powledge v. United States

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided February 7, 1950No. Civ. A. No. 3621PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOPER, District Judge.

Mary J. Powledge brought this action against the United States, alleging she was named beneficiary (as one in loco parentis) in a National Service Life Insurance policy upon the life of Henry G. Beasley, a deceased soldier. In their answers both the United States and the wife of assured (a third party defendant) contend that plaintiff’s relationship as on'e standing in the place of a parent to the assured, did not begin until assured was twenty-one years of age and that therefore, plaintiff cannot recover.

Facts Appearing on Pretrial Hearing.

Upon a pre-trial hearing the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Niewiadomski v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
  2. Leyerly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
  3. Meisner v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1924
  4. Zazove v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946
  5. Howard v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. RockCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
  2. Banks v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API