Powledge v. United States
District Court, N.D. Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
HOOPER, District Judge.
Mary J. Powledge brought this action against the United States, alleging she was named beneficiary (as one in loco parentis) in a National Service Life Insurance policy upon the life of Henry G. Beasley, a deceased soldier. In their answers both the United States and the wife of assured (a third party defendant) contend that plaintiff’s relationship as on'e standing in the place of a parent to the assured, did not begin until assured was twenty-one years of age and that therefore, plaintiff cannot recover.
Facts Appearing on Pretrial Hearing.
Upon a pre-trial hearing the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Niewiadomski v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
- Leyerly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
- Meisner v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1924
- Zazove v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946
- Howard v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. RockCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Banks v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1958