Legal Opinion

Main Course Foodsolutions, Inc. v. The Kraft Heinz Company

District Court, D. Puerto Rico

Decided March 3, 2021No. 3:21-cv-01033Unknown

1Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO 2 MAIN COURSE FOODSOLUTIONS, INC., 3 Plaintiff, 4 v. Civil No. 21-1033 (GAG) 5 THE KRAFT HEINZ CO. & KRAFT 6 HEINZ P.R., LLC; 7 Defendants. 8 OPINION & ORDER 9 The Kraft Heinz Company (“Kraft Heinz Co.”) and Kraft Heinz Puerto Rico, LLC (“Kraft 10 Heinz P.R.”) (collectively, “Defendants”) filed a motion to compel arbitration pursuant to the 11 Federal Arbitration Act,

9 U.S.C. §§ 1-307

(“FAA”), given that their agreement includes an 12 arbitration clause that covers the claims set forth in the complaint. (Docket No. 11). The Court 13…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Arthur Andersen LLP v. CarlisleSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. New Comm Wireless Services, Inc. v. SprintCom, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API