Legal Opinion

United States v. Wecht

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 14, 2009No. 2:06-cv-00026PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SEAN J. McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.

Presently pending before me in the above-captioned case is the Defendant’s motion seeking reconsideration of the denial of his Rule 29 motions, the denial of his motion to dismiss charges brought under 18 U.S.C. § 666, and the denial of certain suppression motions. For the reasons set forth below, the Defendant’s motion for reconsideration is granted and his requests for substantive relief are granted in part.

I. BACKGROUND 1

The Defendant, Dr. Cyril Wecht, is a renowned forensic pathologist and former Coroner of Allegheny County. On January…

2Cases cited79 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. OrieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. GreenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. United States v. HarrisDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. United States v. WrightDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Com. v. Smith, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2026

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API