Legal Opinion
Felder v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided November 25, 2002No. 24845PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KENNETH W. SHRUM, Judge.
Rodney Felder (“Movant”) appeals a judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief from his convictions for first degree robbery (§ 569.020), armed criminal action (§ 571.015), and felonious restraint (§ 565.120). 1 Movant charges the motion court erred by not finding his appellate counsel ineffective; specifically, he alleges counsel was ineffective for not challenging, in the direct appeal, the trial court’s exclusion of certain testimonial evidence. We find no error in the denial of Movant’s Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm.
The following account of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Smith v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- State v. UmfreesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- Mallett v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
- Franklin v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. BarrinerSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
- State v. SandersMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. NormanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. LeeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. SandersMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.