Legal Opinion

United States v. George A. Fuller Co.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided May 23, 1924No. 2485PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POLLOCK, District Judge.

This action at law arises out of the building of the cantonment in this state known as Camp Funston. The government entered into what is termed a cost plus contract with defendant for the doing of the construction work of this cantonment. This contract is in writing, attached to and forming part of the plaintiff’s cause of action. The theory of damages on which the plaintiff in its amended petition relies is this:

That in certain respects defendant was guilty of waste, wrongs, and negligence. These examples of alleged negligence and wrongdoing, pleaded in quite general…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. ConverseSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Moran v. . Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Linn v. SigsbeeIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Maguire v. Middlesex RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  5. Bissell v. WertIndiana Supreme Court · 1871

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. DomiraDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1931
  2. Creighton v. BloomSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API