Legal Opinion

Pelullo v. Patterson

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided March 31, 1992No. Civ. A. 91-4239PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOLIN, District Judge.

Defendant New Jersey State Commission of Investigation (“SCI”), an agency of the State of New Jersey created by N.J.S.A. § 52:9M-1, has moved to dismiss plaintiff’s claims pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted and on the ground that the claims are barred by the applicable statute of limitations. For the reasons set forth below, defendants’ motion will be denied in part and granted in part. Plaintiff has cross-moved to amend his complaint. That motion will be granted.

I. BACKGROUND

On October 3, 1990, plaintiff…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. University Gardens Apartments Joint Venture v. JohnsonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2006
  2. Castellanos v. McKenzieDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API