Legal Opinion
State v. Perez
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 24, 1981PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArmentano, J.
The defendant was tried and found guilty by the jury of the crimes of burglary in the third degree 1 in violation of General Statutes § 53a-103 and larceny in the first degree 2 in violation of General Statutes § 53a-122 (a) (2). The defendant has appealed claiming that the court erred (1) in refusing to grant his motion for acquittal; (2) in refusing to set aside the verdict; (3) in charging the jury on circumstantial evidence; and (4) in failing to instruct the jury with his requested charge.
At this trial there was evidence presented from which the jury could have found the following facts:…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- State v. GaynorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- State v. RuizSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- State v. TheriaultSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- State v. SinclairSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. RodgersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. KingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- State v. McKnightSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.