Legal Opinion

Horwitz v. Sax

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 8, 2005PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Edward Ramos, J.), entered October 16, 2003, which, inter alia, granted defendants’ motions to dismiss on the ground that the court lacked jurisdiction over necessary parties, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiffs do not dispute that nominal defendant Edward Baroudi, a resident of France, is a necessary party and it is evident that there exists no jurisdictional predicate for joining him in the action. Accordingly, dismissal was warranted because New York courts lack jurisdiction over a necessary party and there is an alternative forum…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ayres v. New York State Commissioner of Taxation & FinanceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Rocha Toussier y Asociados, S. C. v. RiveroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Andre v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API