Wittig v. Hoffart
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtFine, J.
¶ 1. Brian K. Hoffart appeals a domestic-abuse injunction in favor of Lana C. Wittig. See Wis. Stat. § 813.12. Hoffart and Wittig are married but estranged. Hoffart claims that the trial court erred in considering facts underlying an earlier domestic-abuse injunction entered against him on Wittig's petition that Wittig later had vacated. Hoffart also claims that there was insufficient evidence to support the trial court's conclusions that an injunction was warranted. We affirm.
I
¶ 2. Hoffart and Wittig were married in early November, 2001. According to Wittig's testimony at the injunction…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. PoellingerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. SullivanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
- Northern States Power Co. v. BugherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- Michelle T. Ex Rel. Sumpter v. CrozierWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. PerkinsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006
- Nancy Kindschy v. Brian AishWisconsin Supreme Court · 2024
- Nancy Kindschy v. Brian AishWisconsin Supreme Court · 2024
- State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006
- v. WollerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2019