Legal Opinion

County Plains Corp. v. Nosband Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 11, 1932PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.

The action is to foreclose a mortgage, with demand for deficiency judgment. The appellant, Nosband Corporation, interposed an answer which contained three counterclaims. On motion all were struck out as improper and insufficient in law. We are here concerned only with the sufficiency of what is termed the “ third counterclaim.” The particular question presented is, whether this counterclaim is “ a cause of action arising out of the contract or transaction set forth in the complaint as the foundation of the plaintiff’s claim or connected with the subject of the action.” (Civ. Prac. Act, § 266.)

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hornstein v. PodwitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. The New-York and New Haven R.R. v. . Schuyler, Cross, C.New York Court of Appeals · 1858
  3. Campbell v. . GatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  4. Wiles v. . SuydamNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  5. Sherlock v. ManwarenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Samworth v. FrankenhoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API