Legal Opinion
Shell Petroleum Corp. v. Anderson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 29, 1934No. 29,794PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STONE, Justice.
Action in unlawful detainer commenced in the municipal court of the city of Owatonna and tried de novo on appeal to the district court. After verdict for defendants, plaintiff moved in the alternative for judgment notwithstanding or a new trial and appealed from the order denying the motion.
The involved property consists of a gasolene filling station and its appurtenances in Owatonna. It is owned by defendant Clarence P. Anderson. Its possession and use are claimed by plaintiff under a lease of August 1, 1930, from the defendants Anderson. (Defendant Rose J. Anderson is joined…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Thompson v. LibbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Kirby v. DeanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- C. Aultman & Co. v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Crooks v. NippoltSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- O'Neil v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hatch v. KulickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Chisholm Water Supply Co. v. City of ChisholmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939