Legal Opinion
Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wisconsin v. Village of Hobart
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 18, 2013No. 12-3419PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POSNER, Circuit Judge.
In 2007 the Village of Hobart, Wisconsin passed an ordinance assessing stormwater management fees on all parcels of land in the village, including those owned by the Oneida Nation of Wisconsin, an Indian tribe. The purpose of the assessment was to finance the construction and operation of a stormwater management system. The tribe sought a declaratory judgment that the assessment could not lawfully be imposed on it. Hobart contended that if the tribe was right on that score (Hobart thought it was wrong), the United States must pay the fees; and so it filed a third-party…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Nevada v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Carcieri v. SalazarSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of Chester v. PHCC LLC d/b/a Preston Hollow Community Capital, eUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- Genskow v. PrevostDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2020
- Jerry Markadonatos v. Village of WoodridgeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Jerry Markadonatos v. Village of WoodridgeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Robert Lee Harris and Misty HarrisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.