Legal Opinion

Heth v. City of Radford

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided July 11, 1898PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Montgomery county rendered on a motion made by the plaintiff in error against the defendant in error.

1Opinion of the Court

Biely, J,,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was an application to the Hustings Court of the city of Badford, under the authority of sec. 571 of the Code, to correct an assessment of levies by the city of Badford on land of the plaintiff in error for the years 1892 and 1893, which were alleged to be erroneous. The judge of that court, being so situated as to render it improper in his opinion for him to try the case, removed it to the Circuit Court of Montgomery county.

On the hearing of the application, the facts were agreed, from which it appears that the land of the plaintiff in error,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Davidson v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Hagar v. Reclamation District No. 108Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Violett v. City Council of AlexandriaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1896

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Whitlock v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1906
  2. Commonwealth v. CarterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
  3. Napier v. City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  4. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. City of Newport NewsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1952
  5. City of Norfolk v. YoungSupreme Court of Virginia · 1900

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API