Legal Opinion

City of Norfolk v. Young

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 18, 1900PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court of Norfolk city, pronounced December 16, 1898, in a suit in chancery brought by the appellee against the appellant and another, for the purpose of having declared void certain local assessments for street improvements made by the council of said city, and to enjoin the city from collecting the same.

1Opinion of the Court

Buchanan, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court..

It was held in the case of Violet & Others v. City Council of Alexandria, 92 Va. 561, and may now be regarded as the settled law of this State, that local assessments by municipal corporations for street improvements are an exercise of the taxing power of the State; that Article XIY. of the amendments to the Constitution of the United States applies to such assessments; and that a law which authorizes them, without giving to the person of whom such assessment is exacted reasonable notice and opportunity to appear and contest the legality,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Violett v. City Council of AlexandriaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
  2. Heth v. City of RadfordSupreme Court of Virginia · 1898

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. City of El Paso v. HowzeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  2. Commonwealth v. CarterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
  3. In Re Application of County TreasurerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  4. Town of Danville v. PaceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1874
  5. Bouslog v. City of GulfportMississippi Supreme Court · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API