Boline v. Wilson
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Lyon district court; Frederick A. Meckel, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam:-
The court is unable to discover any just cause for the defendant to complain of the judgment against him. He gave the note in suit, and has never paid it or offered to pay it. He had no right to contest the title to the note further than was necessary to preclude h}s future liability upon it. It was no concern of his if there were unadjusted matters between the plaintiff and the bank, provided a judgment against him in favor of the plaintiff would relieve him of responsibility to the bank. The plaintiff did in fact always own the note. The surrender of possession of the note by…
2Cited by20 opinions
- Ex Parte GilbertCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
- Foster v. City of AugustaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
- State v. SevernsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
- James v. AmrineSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
- Schuber v. McDuffeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.