Legal Opinion

Carter v. Kim

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 9, 1981No. 61391PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Banke, Judge.

The plaintiffs sued to recover $17,000 which they had paid to the defendants pursuant to an agreement for the purchase of a business known as “Mutt & Jeff Porkskins Company.” The complaint alleged both that the agreement was unenforceable and that it had been mutually rescinded. The trial court found the contract unenforceable as a matter of law, both because it failed to identify the assets included in the sale and because the defendants were shown not to be the actual owners of the business. He accordingly directed a verdict for the plaintiffs, and the defendants appealed.

The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jinright v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  2. Quillian & Bros. v. Wales Adding Machine Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Jackson v. EastersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  2. Allen v. BrackettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  3. De La Gonzalez v. Krystal Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  4. Harvey v. Bank One, N.A.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  5. Gymco Construction Company, Inc. v. Architectural Glass & Windows, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API