Legal Opinion
In Re Grand Jury Empaneled on April 6, 1993
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided December 6, 1994No. Misc. 93-36 (WGB)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
■OPINION
BASSLER, District Judge:
The government has filed this motion to compel respondent, 1 a target of a federal grand jury investigation, to appear and testify before the grand jury. Specifically, the government seeks to compel respondent, as a custodian of records for a corporation also under investigation, to produce corporate records to the grand jury and to provide oral testimony sufficient to bring the records within the business records exception to the hearsay rule, Federal Rule of Evidence 803(6). The issue presented, one of first impression in this Circuit, is whether compelled…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Grand Jury WitnessesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- In Re Grand Jury Investigation of Possible Violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1461District Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- United States v. RaniereDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
- In Re Grand Jury ProceedingsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
- Ann's Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.