Legal Opinion

Hemingway v. Mauer

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 5, 2012No. C104430RO; A147428PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, P. J.

As part of a continuing dissolution proceeding, husband appeals from the trial court’s decision to continue a restraining order against him based on the Family Abuse Prevention Act, ORS 107.700 to 107.735 (FAPA). ORS 107.718(10) (allowing hearing to contest ex parte FAPA order). Because husband was denied the opportunity to cross-examine wife’s witness, we vacate the order and remand.

Under ORS 107.718(1), a court may issue a FAPA restraining order upon a showing that the petitioner:

“[H]as been the victim of abuse committed by the respondent within 180 days preceding the filing of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Fulton v. FultonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  2. In re the Marriage of Howell-HooymanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Decker v. KlapatchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. In re the Marriage of DominguezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  3. Johnson v. CaptainCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API