People v. Ethridge
California Court of Appeal
1ConcurrenceFourt, J.
I concur in the affirming of the judgment in this ease because I can do nothing else under the circumstances, There are, however, some factors in this matter *287which in my opinion warrant further attention. It is to be noted that the information charged ‘ ‘ [t] hat at the time of the commission of the above offense, said defendant was armed with a deadly weapon to wit, one small caliber automatic pistol” and ‘ ‘ [t] hat before the commission of the offenses hereinbefore set forth in this information, said defendant, Jack Bay Ethridge, was in the Superior Court of the State of California, in and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- People v. RaleighCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- People v. EganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- People v. RanerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- People v. ShafferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- People v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.