Legal Opinion

State v. Humphery

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 5, 1981No. 21390PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ness, Justice:

Appellant Johnny Humphrey, Jr., was convicted of housebreaking and grand larceny. We affirm.

Appellant first asserts the trial court abused its discretion in allowing the State to reopen its case and present evidence that the value of the property taken exceeded $50.00 after he had moved for a directed verdict. We disagree.

It is within the sound discretion of the trial judge to allow the State to reopen its case and prove an essential element of the offense charged. State v. Hammond, 270 S. C. 347, 242 S. E. (2d) 411 (1978); State v. Harrison, 236 S. C. 246, 113 S. E. (2d) 783…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. HammondSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  2. State v. HarrisonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  4. State v. ToddSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  5. State v. KirkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Joseph v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  2. State v. ParkerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  3. Singletary v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  4. State v. StoneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  5. State v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API