Angino v. Confederation Life Insurance
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County
1Opinion of the Court
KLEINFELTER, J.,
Before the court-is the motion of defendants L. David Spealler and Asset Management Group to disqualify plaintiff Richard C. Angino as counsel. The motion raises a novel question of law: To what extent does Rule 3.7 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Professional Conduct, providing that a lawyer shall not act as advocate at a trial in which the lawyer is likely to be a necessary witness, conflict with the generally recognized constitutional right of a party to self-representation?
In this case, plaintiffs, Richard C. and Alice K. Angino, filed a complaint alleging various causes of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Andrews v. Bechtel Power Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Mitchell A. KRAMER and David C. Harrison v. SCIENTIFIC CONTROL CORP. Et Al. Appeal of ARTHUR ANDERSEN & CO.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- International Electronics Corp. v. FlanzerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- John T. O'reilly, and Contemporary Mission, Inc. v. The New York Times CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Brooks v. South Carolina Commission on Indigent DefenseCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2017