Legal Opinion · Dissent

Garrett v. Impac Hotels 1, L.L.C.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 8, 2002No. ED 80260Published

1DissentMary R. Russell, J.

I respectfully dissent because Impac Hotels 1, L.L.C., doing business as Holiday Inn St. Louis Airport North (“Hotel”), was not entitled to judgment as a matter of law, and a genuine issue of material fact existed.

Jack Garrett (“Guest”) claims liability against Hotel based on information he allegedly obtamed from a Hotel employee while he was staying at Hotel. Guest, a non-resident of the area, was taking advantage of Hotel’s offer of a lodging and parking package while he flew round-trip via the nearby airport. He maintains that during his stay he asked a Hotel employee whether it was safe…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Virginia D. v. Madesco Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  3. M.C. v. YearginMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Plant v. Howard Johnson's Motor LodgeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Fennema v. Howard Johnson Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API