Legal Opinion

Merchants Nat. Bank v. Mosser

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 7, 1894No. Appeal, No. 406PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal, No. 406, Jan. T., 1894, by J. L. Kaufman et al., from order of C. P. Cumberland Co., May T., 1893, No. 482, distributing proceeds of sheriff’s sale of property of John C. Mosser, at suit of Merchants National Bank of Carlisle. Exceptions to auditor’s report.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 406, Jan. T., 1894, by J. L. Kaufman et al., from order of C. P. Cumberland Co., May T., 1893, No. 482, distributing proceeds of sheriff’s sale of property of John C. Mosser, at suit of Merchants National Bank of Carlisle. Exceptions to auditor’s report. From the report of the auditor, S. M. Leidich, Esq., it appeared that in 1892 the Merchants National Bank held a judgment against John C. Mosser for $500. This judgment was paid, but H. R. Mosser, father of J. C. Mosser, and agent for the son, entered into an agreement with the bank Nov. 19,1892, by which the judgment should not…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

For reasons given by the learned judge who specially presided at the hearing, we think there is no error in the decree. All that is necessary to be said in relation to the questions involved will be found in his opinion.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed with costs to be paid by appellants.

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Billy Mac ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  2. STATE EX REL. DEWBERRY v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Farmers National Bank v. KernSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Rougelot v. QuickSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1882
  5. State ex rel. Stewart v. Police JurySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1882

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API