Legal Opinion
Bray v. Willey
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided October 25, 1965No. 5-3645PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ed. P. McFaddin, Associate Justice.
This is a garnishment case; and the issue is the alleged liability of the garnishee to the judgment plaintiff. Although the amount here involved is very small in monetary value, the legal principles are so important that much time has been spent in research.1
On January 10, 1963, appellant Bray recovered a damage judgment against Dave Haneline for $215.97. On January 25, 1963 Bray caused a writ of garnishment after judgment (Ark. Stat. Ann. § 31-501 et seq. [Repl. 1962]) to be served on Ed Willey & Son (hereinafter sometimes referred to as “garnishee” or as…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Russell v. Fred G. Pohl Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Ralston Purina Co. v. KingMissouri Court of Appeals · 1937
- Harris v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
- Paisley ex rel. Hooper v. Park Fireproof Storage Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1921
- Coward v. BarnesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Waelder Oil & Gas, Inc. v. Southwestern Glass Co. (In Re Southwestern Glass Co.)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- James M. Walsh v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Richard McClean Patricia PattermanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- In Re: Southwestern Glass Company, Inc., Debtor. Waelder Oil & Gas, Inc. Fred J. Waelder v. Southwestern Glass Company, Inc. v. The Bank of Arkansas, Na, Garnishee/appellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Montoya v. FergusonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2022