Hall v. Harleysville Mutual Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBabNiiill, J.
It is to be noted in the beginning that the demurrer is in general terms. It does not point out any particular fact which should be but is not alleged. It seems to be directed solely to the contention that plaintiff as a third party beneficiary has no right to maintain an action on the policy. Even so, we take note of certain contentions advanced by defendant in its brief as to why the complaint fails to state a cause of action.
It is settled law with us that where the policy of insurance is against liability and not of indemnity and the liability of the insured has been established by…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- MacClure v. Accident & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Carolina Transportation & Distributing Co. v. American Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bradford v. KellySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Brevard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Seguro-Suarez by and Through Connette v. Key Risk Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- Squires v. Textile InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Craven v. DemidovichCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.