Legal Opinion

Peiffer v. French

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 10, 1940No. Gen. No. 40,889Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

This cause comes before us on a rehearing. An opinion was heretofore filed by this court in the above entitled cause on April 10,1940. Our attention has been called to the fact that the Supreme Court in the recent case of Ingalls v. Raklios, 373 Ill. 404, has changed the rule with relation to the issuance of a capias ad satisfaciendum, by requiring that the judgment order of the court contain the statement that malice is the gist of the action and not as formerly, that the verdict of the jury finding such fact was sufficient.

In the case of Ingalls v. Raklios, 373 Ill. 404, which…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ingalls v. RakliosIllinois Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Lipman v. GoebelIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Fromm v. SeyllerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1927
  4. Mantske v. RhutasselAppellate Court of Illinois · 1928
  5. Rosenberg v. OttAppellate Court of Illinois · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API