Legal Opinion

Handley v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided June 21, 1996No. CR-95-501PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON RETURN TO REMAND

The appellant, Frank Handley, appeals from the summary denial of his petition for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 32, Ala. R. Crim. P. We remanded this case, on the state's motion, for the circuit court to determine if the appellant had been correctly informed of the sentence he faced upon pleading guilty. Handley v. State, 686 So.2d 539 (Ala.Cr.App. 1996). See Cantu v. State, 660 So.2d 1026 (Ala. 1994).

The court has furnished us a copy of the guilty plea colloquy with the appellant. The colloquy shows that the appellant was informed that the minimum sentence…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cantu v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  2. Handley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Calloway v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  2. White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  3. Riley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2004
  4. Schartau v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  5. Ex parte Stanford Pritchett.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API