Legal Opinion

In Re the Welfare of P.R.L.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 25, 2000No. C4-99-1214PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge

Challenging the trial court’s decision to lift a stay and enter an order terminating her parental rights, appellant Roxanne La’Near contends that the court did not make the necessary findings of fact. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

Eleven-year-old P.L. and his two older siblings (who have been placed in long-term foster care and whose parentage is not at issue in this case) have been in out-of-home placement since June 1996. In January 1998, the county petitioned to terminate appellant’s parental rights to P.L., alleging that appellant had neglected her children; that both…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Marriage of Sefkow v. SefkowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. In Re the Welfare of M.D.O.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Matter of Welfare of ChosaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Matter of Welfare of C. ChildrenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Matter of Welfare of MaasCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re the Welfare of P.R.L.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API