Legal Opinion

Brancato v. Ambrosio

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1957PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSamuel Eabih, J.

Motion by plaintiff for leave to serve a supplemental complaint in addition to the original complaint.

Ordinarily on such a motion the court does not examine the merits of the proposed pleading. (Ponticello v. Prudential Ins. Co., 281 App. Div. 549.) Where, however, the proposed pleading completely lacks merit and can only cause delay and confusion leave should he denied. (Stanford v. Cayuga Linen & *736Cotten Mills, 255 App. Div. 928.) Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for having been evicted from an apartment which the landlord claimed he needed for his son, but which was not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. David v. FaymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. David v. FaymanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  3. Ponticello v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  4. Stanford v. LinenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Levert v. Central School District No. 6New York Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API