Fallgren v. Railway Express Agency
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.
The plaintiff has declared upon a special contract that the defendant would “deliver on time” the shipment to Gaines-ville, Georgia. The declaration alleges that this agreement “was evidenced by” the uniform express receipt. The receipt however fails to bear out the plaintiff’s allegations. Under its terms the shipment was subject to the defendant’s official express classification No. 33 (I.C.C. No. 4500). This provides by rule 7, “Conditions of Delivery, (a) Agreement as to time of delivery of express matter must not be made unless provision for such agreement is contained in lawfully…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chicago & Alton Railroad v. KirbySupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Davis v. CornwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Walker v. Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1866
- Clegg v. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
- Long v. . N.Y.C.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Schreppel v. Campbell Sixty-Six Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1968