Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Fairley

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 16, 1982No. 2415PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Judge:

Following a jury trial, appellant, Booker T. Fairley, was found guilty of driving under the influence of alcohol. 1 Post-verdict motions were denied and a one year period of probation was imposed. This direct appeal followed. We affirm.

On appeal, appellant raises two issues: (1) whether his right to a speedy trial under Pa.R.Crim.P. 1100 was violated; and (2) whether the evidence was sufficient to support his conviction.

The facts pertinent to appellant’s Rule 1100 claim are as follows:

On June 30, 1978, a criminal complaint was filed against appellant charging him with driving…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BlairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Commonwealth v. SheltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Commonwealth v. MayfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Commonwealth v. RaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Commonwealth v. BensonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WallsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Commonwealth v. DerrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Commonwealth v. KelleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API