Legal Opinion

Hooker v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided October 23, 1996No. 09-95-182 CRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

932 S.W.2d 712 (1996)

Allen D. HOOKER, Appellant,

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 09-95-182 CR.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Beaumont.

Submitted June 27, 1996.

Decided October 23, 1996.

Margarett J. Goodson, Conroe, for appellant.

Daniel C. Rice, District Attorney, Conroe, for state.

Before WALKER, C.J., and BURGESS and STOVER, JJ.

OPINION

WALKER, Chief Justice.

A jury convicted appellant of having committed the felony offense of Driving While Intoxicated—Subsequent Offense. The jury then assessed punishment at confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice— Institutional Division for a term…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Clewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  4. Nickerson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. Hooker v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API