Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. The Mead Corporation D/B/A Escanaba Paper Company
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 8, 1996No. 94-6250Published
1Opinion of the Court 1
73 F.3d 74
151 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2169, 64 USLW 2512,
131 Lab.Cas. P 11,486
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
The MEAD CORPORATION d/b/a Escanaba Paper Company, Respondent.
No. 94-6250.
United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.
Argued Nov. 27, 1995.
Decided Jan. 8, 1996.
Aileen A. Armstong, Deputy Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Frederick C. Havard (briefed), Christopher Young (argued and briefed), N.L.R.B., Washington, DC, for Petitioner.
Robert Joseph Brown (argued and briefed), Todd D. Penney, Thompson, Hine & Flory, Dayton, OH, for Respondent.
Before: MARTIN and JONES, Circuit Judges; COHN,…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Martin; Dissent.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Linn v. United Plant Guard Workers of America, Local 114Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Republic Aviation Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Metropolitan Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Larand Leisurelies, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, Afl-Cio, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.