Legal Opinion

State v. Tolliver

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided February 1, 1989No. 88-0779-CRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, J.

Tonnie Tolliver appeals from a post-conviction order denying his request for dismissal of uttering a forged writing charge and issuance of worthless check charges based on sufficiency of evidence grounds. The same order grants Tolliver a new trial because an illegally obtained confession was used against him.

A preliminary jurisdictional issue is presented. The state argues that the post-conviction order is a nonfinal order which is not appealable as a matter of right. The state does not object to our addressing Tolliver’s claims on a discretionary appeal basis. As suming the matter is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. JenichWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Fredrick v. City of JanesvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State v. HamiltonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Burg v. Miniature Precision Components, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Radoff v. Red Owl Stores, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. MendezCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
  2. State v. EisenbergCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API