Legal Opinion

State v. Hamilton

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1984No. 83-1539-CRPublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShirley S. Abrahamson, J.

This appeal, before the court on certification by the court of appeals pursuant to sec. 809.61, Stats. 1981-82, is from a judgment of conviction and from an order of the circuit court for Kenosha county, William U. Zievers, Circuit Judge. Kurt F. Hamilton, the defendant, was convicted of obstructing an officer contrary to sec. 946.41(1) ; his motion for postconviction relief was denied. We reverse the conviction.

This case presents an unusual fact situation, but the facts are simple and undisputed. The prosecution and conviction for obstructing an officer were based on the defendant’s refusal…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Brown v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. PerkinsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. ReedWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. KramsvogelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. MooreWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API