Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Brown

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1972Published

1Opinion of the Court

493 P.2d 1376 (1972)

In re Complaint As to the Conduct of Neil BROWN, Accused.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted December 6, 1971.

Decided February 24, 1972.

William G. Wheatley, Eugene, argued the cause for accused. On the briefs was John E. Jaqua, Eugene.

Harold D. Gillis, Eugene, argued the cause for Oregon State Bar. With him on the brief was Jon A. Joseph, Eugene.

Before O'CONNELL, C.J., and DENECKE, HOLMAN, TONGUE and BRYSON, JJ.

2Per curiam

This is a disciplinary proceeding by the Oregon State Bar charging the accused with unethical conduct. Most of the charges in the complaint arise out of…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of StaplesOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. In Re SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API