Legal Opinion
Manatis v. Cumberland & Manchester Railroad
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided December 6, 1927PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge McCandless
Affirming.
Eebecca Manatis filed an action in the Knox circuit court against the Cumberland & Manchester Railroad Company for damages growing out of a breach of duty alleged to be due her as a prospective passenger while in its depot. The court sustained a-demurrer to the petition as twice amended, and plaintiff has appealed. In substance, the petition as amended alleges that the defendant maintains a passenger station and depot at Heidrick, at the junction of its railroad with that of the L. & N. R. R. Co.; that plaintiff desired to become a passenger on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Ry. Co. v. RueCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
- Illinois Central R. R. v. LalogeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
- Hines v. WallsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. FordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
- Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. Wilson's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ahlquist v. Mulvaney Realty Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1944
- Louisville & N. R. Co. v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1952
- Wheeler v. Southeastern Greyhound Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951