Richardson v. Fowler
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
(after stating the facts).
The law in the case has been settled in favor of the defendant by several decisions of this court, and we cite the following: Gibson v. Inman Packet Co., 111 Ark. 521; Georgia Marble Finishing Works v. Minor, 128 Ark. 124; McGehee v. Yunker & Ronk, 137 Ark. 397.
In the last mentioned case the court said that the delivery of goods by the seller to the carrier duly consigned to the purchaser constitutes a delivery to the purchaser and consummates the sale. The court also said that the converse of the rule is, that where the seller consigns the shipment to his own order,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gibson v. Inman Packet Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
- Georgia Marble Finishing Works v. MinorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
- McGehee v. Yunker & RonkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
3Cited by4 opinions
- Barry v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
- Central Kansas Milling Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
- John Meeter & Sons v. Paragould Wholesale Grocer Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
- McKinney v. Ragland & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1924