Legal Opinion

Askia Sankofa Ashanti v. State of California, et al.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided March 10, 2026No. 2:25-cv-02459Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ASKIA SANKOFA ASHANTI, NO. CV 25-02459-AB (AGR) 12 Plaintiff, 13 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY v. THE COURT SHOULD NOT 14 RECOMMEND DISMISSAL OF 15 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., CERTAIN DEFENDANTS WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a First Amended 20 Complaint (“FAC”) against eight categories of defendants: (1) the United States of 21 22 America, the President, and the Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban 23 Development…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Linda R. S. v. Richard D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API