Legal Opinion

Gill v. Public Employees Retirement Board of the Public Employees Retirement Ass'n

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided November 21, 2002No. 21,818PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PICKARD, Judge.

{1} This case is a sequel to Cockrell v. Board of Regents of New Mexico State University, 2002-NMSC-009, 132 N.M. 156, 45 P.3d 876. There, the Supreme Court canvassed the authorities leading to Alden v. Maine, 527 U.S. 706, 119 S.Ct. 2240, 144 L.Ed.2d 636 (1999), and held that constitutional sovereign immunity required dismissal of the plaintiffs suit to enforce his rights under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act because the New Mexico legislature had not specifically waived such immunity by statute. Cockrell, 2002-NMSC-009, ¶¶4-8, 11, 15, 24, 132 N.M. 156, 45 P.3d…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Alden v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Kimel v. Florida Board of RegentsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gill v. Public Employees Retirement Board of the Public Employees Retirement Ass'n of New MexicoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Gill v. Public Employees Retirement Board of the Public Employees Retirement Ass'n of New MexicoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Gill v. Public Employees Retirement Board of the Public Employees Retirement Ass'n of New MexicoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API