Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Gill v. Public Employees Retirement Board of the Public Employees Retirement Ass'n of New Mexico

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 2004No. 27,823Published

1ConcurrenceMinzner, Justice

(specially concurring).

{40} I concur in the majority opinion but write separately in order to emphasize the importance I place on the analysis in Cockrell v. Board of Regents of New Mexico State University, 2002-NMSC-009, 132 N.M. 156, 45 P.3d 876, in reversing the Court of Appeals. Further, I believe the opinion of the Court of Appeals, as did the opinion in Cockrell, recognized an important anomaly within the body of case law we apply. I am persuaded that we adopted an approach in Cockrell we should continue to pursue.

{41} In Cockrell, we discussed the effect of several opinions by the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Alden v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Kimel v. Florida Board of RegentsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Hicks v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Cockrell v. Board of Regents of New Mexico State UniversityNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API