Legal Opinion

Greenfield v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 16, 1914No. 5605PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Accusation of misdemeanor; from city court of Brunswick— Judge ICrauss. March 14, 1914.

1Opinion of the CourtRoan, J.

1. Where the motion for a new trial does not specifically raise the point that the venue of the crime alleged was not shown, it can not be raised in the appellate court. Acts of 1911, p. 150.

2. In á prosecution for simple larceny, where it appears that the goods alleged to have been stolen were sold by the defendant, and they are thus, shown to have had some value, it is unnecessary to prove the exact price paid. From the evidence it appears that the defendant admitted that the goods alleged to have been stolen were sold by him. This was sufficient to show they were of some value. See Tolver…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ayers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Morrow Transfer Co. v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  3. Tolver v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  4. Corona Coal & Iron Co. v. Copeland & SonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Payne v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  2. Miller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API