Legal Opinion

Morrow Transfer Co. v. Robinson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 11, 1910No. 2788PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Action for damages; from city court of Atlanta — Judge Reid. May 19, '1910.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.

1. Value, whether actual or as regulated by the market, is largely a matter of individual estimate or opinion, and liberality should be allowed in the introduction of testimony to prove value. There are many elements and tests of value. Proof of cost, condition of the property, when lost, value of similar property, prices at which similar-articles arc sold, uses to which the property is adapted, opinions of experienced dealers, in such property, and opinions of experts, all have more or less probative value; and, in short, any testimony, direct or circumstantial, which tends to throw light on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Peterson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  3. Atlanta Baggage & Cab Co. v. MizoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lehman v. Hansord Pontiac Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. Kraft v. Rowland & RowlandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  3. Collins & Glennville Railroad v. BeasleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
  4. Crump v. KnoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  5. Owen v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API