United States v. Larry Miller
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM E. DOYLE, Circuit Judge.
The question in this case is whether a criminal prosecution can be employed for the purpose of settling what in essence is a property dispute.
Defendant Larry Miller was charged with criminal trespass for crossing Indian land on the Wind River Indian Reservation. The prosecution was pursued under an assimilated Wyoming statute § 6-10-102 (1977), and the assimilation was through 18 U.S.C. § 13. It was made applicable to the Wind River Indian Reservation by 18 U.S.C. § 7. Section 6-10-102 provides as follows:
Whoever enters into or upon the land or premises of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Robert F. Jennings v. Arthur Shuman, Jr., Robert J. Conway, Gustave Naring, and John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Dry Creek Lodge, Inc., a Wyoming Corporation v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- Daniel L. Tappen, M. D. v. Law Lamar Ager, M. D.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
- Steele v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
- State v. LarasonLicking County Court of Common Pleas · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Reed v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988
- United States v. McPhilomyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- State v. GillardSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
- In re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. JV-512490Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- State v. Gillard, Holland, JonesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.