Legal Opinion

United States v. Larry Miller

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 16, 1981No. 80-2289PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM E. DOYLE, Circuit Judge.

The question in this case is whether a criminal prosecution can be employed for the purpose of settling what in essence is a property dispute.

Defendant Larry Miller was charged with criminal trespass for crossing Indian land on the Wind River Indian Reservation. The prosecution was pursued under an assimilated Wyoming statute § 6-10-102 (1977), and the assimilation was through 18 U.S.C. § 13. It was made applicable to the Wind River Indian Reservation by 18 U.S.C. § 7. Section 6-10-102 provides as follows:

Whoever enters into or upon the land or premises of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Robert F. Jennings v. Arthur Shuman, Jr., Robert J. Conway, Gustave Naring, and John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  2. Dry Creek Lodge, Inc., a Wyoming Corporation v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
  3. Daniel L. Tappen, M. D. v. Law Lamar Ager, M. D.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
  4. Steele v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
  5. State v. LarasonLicking County Court of Common Pleas · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Reed v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988
  2. United States v. McPhilomyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  3. State v. GillardSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  4. In re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. JV-512490Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  5. State v. Gillard, Holland, JonesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API